Lourdes is supported by:

-The obedience and lifelong attestment of the visionary:  St. Bernadette
-The fact that the message given her, which confounded her bishop, could not have been manufactured by a young girl
-The fact that dozens of others in neighboring towns mimicked Bernadette after the initial vision but were all disproved
-The fact that St. Bernadette's body remains intact; incorrupt
-A spring of water gushed forth from the dry dirt that Bernadette obediently washed in at the request of Mary.  And from these waters:
-The physical testimony of thousands of cures from the healing water, hundreds of the healings irrefuteable by normal rationale, and the dozens that passed the stringent standards to receive Church approval.

"In 1858, four years after the dogma of the Immaculate Conception was proclaimed, Mary appeared to a very poor young girl, Bernadette Soubirous, eighteen times between February 11 and July 16, 1858. On March 25, 1858, on the feast of the Annunciation, Our Lady revealed to the uneducated Bernadette, 'I am the Immaculate Conception.' Because the dogma had been officially proclaimed less than four years earlier, and Bernadette could not even have know of its existence, great credibility was given to Bernadette by her repetition of the Blessed Mother's word. It was an affirmation from Heaven of the truth of the dogma. In addition, Bernadette was told by Mary to begin digging in the ground; she obediently did so, to the townspeople's scorn. water immediately began flowing from the spot where Bernadette dug, a tiny stream that since has grown to the size of a small river. Thousands of healings have been reported as the result of bathing in or drinking this miraculous water. The walls of the grotto where the Blessed Mother appeared are lined with the crutches of the lame who have walked away from the waters, totally healed."


Miraculous Cures

There is a story, a true story, that takes us back almost three hundred years, to Rome. A young English aristocrat arrives there and establishes contact with someone high in the Vatican. He wants to know what really happens when miracles are being approved by the Church in support of beatifications and canonizations. He is convinced that Rome carelessly admits any sudden cure as a miracle. In response, his contact in the Vatican gives him a thick dossier about a miraculous cure recently submitted to the Sacred Congregation of Rites.
The aristocrat goes home, studies the dossier and a few days later hands it back with the words: This most certainly was a miracle. The Vatican man, still Monsignore Prospero Lambertini and not yet Pope Benedict XIV, replies with a dry smile: the case has already been rejected.
Catholic doctors can be sure of two things: One is that the Church will always be most careful about certifying miracles. She has to certify them because every process of beatification and canonization depends, among other things, for its favorable outcome on the Church's approval of at least one miraculous healing obtained through the intercession of the person to be beatified or canonized. That approval puts therefore the very infallibility of the Church on the line. The Church will not be overawed just because the doctor, who states that medical science cannot explain the healing, happens to be a Nobel-laureate. The Church will show extreme carefulness, because in doing so it simply cares for that supernatural vitality of hers of which miracles are the most palpable signs.

Diagnosing a miracle -- a long process
By Uwe Siemon-Netto
UPI Religion Correspondent
From the Life & Mind Desk
Published 4/9/2002 4:33 PM
PARIS, April 9 (UPI) -- The pilgrimage season in Lourdes, at the foothills of the French Pyrenees, is in full swing again since Easter, keeping a bearded man nicknamed "Docteur Miracle" on the lookout for a new sign from God.
Of course, Patrick Theillier, head of the Medical Bureau of Our Lady of Lourdes, would never describe his job that way. "All we can do is give a negative assessment -- that there is no scientific explanation for the sudden cure of a grave illness," he told United Press International.
However, reaching this conclusion involves a lengthy investigation at different levels that can take decades. "And even then there is no guarantee that a cure will be termed a miracle. It's always up to the pilgrim's bishop to make that decision," said Theillier, a specialist in gastroenterology.
Consider this: Some 6 million pilgrims attend this marvelous gathering of the world's Catholic faithful. In the 154 years since the Virgin Mary was reported to have appeared to Bernadette Soubirous, a peasant girl, only 66 of some 7,000 cases of healing were recognized as "signs from God."
"There probably should have been more," Theillier allowed. "But many previously ill pilgrims don't even report the disappearance of their sickness. And if you are a Protestant, you won't have a Catholic bishop to concede that a miracle has happened to you."
To make his point, Theillier gave UPI an e-mail from Sandra Charles, an Australian Protestant woman, who could not have children.
"My doctor in Australia had advised me to have IVF (in-vitro fertilization) and ... I declined ... So my husband and I decided it was God's way and accepted the fact that I would not bear him children."
But Sandra Charles had seen the 1943 Hollywood movie, "The Song of Bernadette," which was based on a moving book on Lourdes by the German Jewish writer Franz Werfel.
So when she and her husband visited France, they went to Lourdes. She drank from the spring water that according to Bernadette Soubirous, the Virgin Mary was reported to have commanded her and future pilgrims to drink.
"When we arrived home we I discovered I was pregnant," wrote Sandra Charles. "My family joked it must have been the wine. My doctors said it was medically impossible."
But the fact is Sandra Charles gave birth to a baby girl and later to a boy. Was it a miracle? Who is to say in the absence of a diocesan bishop?
Nevertheless, she believes, "I was blessed by Our Lady while I was there in Lourdes," and Patrick Theillier, the sanctuary doctor, rejoiced with her, though he will never be able to certify the absence of a scientific explanation. He was not consulted.
He will not get involved easily, he insisted. Before he does, the patient must meet a host of conditions. "He or she must be gravely ill, suffering from a known disease that was diagnosed by medical professionals," Theillier pointed out.
"The illness must be neither not psychological nor even psychosomatic, but strictly physiological and unresponsive to treatment. The cure is to have been instant and complete. We will not consider cases of remission or of a repression of the disease."
Who is "we?" Well, to begin with, Theillier and any medical doctor present at Lourdes at any given time. "Together, these doctors come from all corners of the world make up the Medical Bureau. Many are Protestants, Jews, Muslims or even agnostics, who accompany pilgrims for strictly humanitarian reasons."
These physicians examine case histories, pathologies, biopsies, x-rays, MRIs and all other forms of scientific evidence in the presence of the rector of the Lourdes sanctuary and the pilgrim's pastor.
Once they have confirmed a cure, the pilgrim must meet with the Medical Bureau repeatedly over a period of three years. "Then the case will be referred to the Lourdes International Medical Committee, which has 20 permanent members and includes a further 10,000 physicians from 75 countries -- again, Catholics, Protestants, Jews, agnostics, even atheist," Theillier said.
The International Committee takes its time. Ten to 15 years can go by before it decides that someone's cure defies medical explanation.
"Only then will we refer the case to the patient's bishop. If he wishes to act upon it, he will assemble a Diocesan Canonical Commission made up of canons, priests, theologians, and physicians. If they agree, the bishop will be able to proclaim the healing a 'sign from God.'"
This happened in 2001, when Bishop Jean-Pierre Dagens of Angoulême in southwestern France, who enjoys the reputation of being one of his church's most powerful minds, recognized a local nurse's sudden and medically inexplicable restoration to health as authentic.
Nurse Jean-Pierre Bély, now 65, was in the final stages of multiple sclerosis. In 1987, he went to Lourdes, where he received the Sacrament of the Sick during Mass. "All of a sudden," his diocese later reported, "he was overcome by a powerful sense of interior liberation and peace."
The next day, Bély was lying in the sanctuary's sick room. Suddenly, he experienced a sense of cold. It grew stronger and stronger and felt quite painful, he told his clerical and medical examiners.
But then he began to feel intensely warm. He sat at the edge of his bed and could move his arms. The next night, he awoke from a deep sleep and discovered he could walk for the first time since 1984.
Raj Persaud, senior lecturer at the Institute of Psychiatry in London, just happened to be in Lourdes when this recognition of Bély's cure was announced.
The British Broadcasting Corporation had sent Persaud to Lourdes "to make an investigation of whether miracles really happen," he later told the BBC's listeners.
He went on, "I found much to my surprise ... that even hard-headed scientists can still be convinced in the 21st century that miracles, which violate the known laws of nature, still happen."
In Bély's case, Persaud discovered a strange analogy between the reactions of those who are restored to health and those who make it through wars and holocausts -- they later suffer from survivor guilt.
Persaud said of Bély, "This man, although largely serene, seemed a little troubled now by the ultimate question, which was, given that many go to Lourdes and don't receive the blessing of a cure, why was he singled out for a miracle?
"It seems that even those who believe in miracle cures or have directly experienced them there remains this last disquieting question -- why me?"
To hear Patrick Theillier, this disquieting question will be asked over and over again in decades to come: Last year, 35 Lourdes pilgrims declared they were miraculously healed.
"Of those, we accepted 10 cases for further examinations," Theillier revealed, "and a decade or more from now, three could go down as signs from God."
Copyright © 2002 United Press International

Code: ZE04021108

Date: 2004-02-11

How Lourdes Cures Are Recognized as Miraculous

Doctors Scrutinize Each Case

LOURDES, France, FEB. 11, 2004 (Zenit.org).- Each year more than 6 million pilgrims visit the Marian shrine at the town of Lourdes, renowned for its miracle cures. But who decides when a cure is a miracle?

The Catholic Church has officially recognized 67 miracles and some 7,000 inexplicable cures since the Blessed Virgin Mary appeared in Lourdes in February 1858, as attested in the book "The Doctor in the Face of Miracles" ("Il medico di fronte ai miracoli"), written by the Italian Doctors Association.

Dr. Patrick Thiellier, director of the medical office established at the shrine to scientifically examine alleged cases of healing, collaborated in the book.

In 1905, Pope Pius X asked that all cases of alleged miracles or cures recorded in Lourdes be analyzed scientifically.

At the shrine's French-language Web page (www.lourdes-france.com) the medical office explains that its objective is to be able to declare a cure "certain, definitive and medically inexplicable."

To do so, it applies four criteria:

-- "the fact and the diagnosis of the illness is first of all established and correctly diagnosed";

-- "the prognosis must be permanent or terminal in the short term";

-- "the cure is immediate, without convalescence, complete and lasting";

-- "the prescribed treatment could not be attributed to the cause of this cure or be an aid to it."

The sick who come to Lourdes with a pilgrimage group are accompanied by a doctor who is furnished with a medical file describing their present condition.

This file forms the basis from which to work when a pilgrim declares that he has been cured. The file, and the pilgrim who claims to have been cured, are presented to the medical office. A doctor based there will then gather the members of the medical profession present in Lourdes on that day who wish to participate in the examination.

No definite conclusion is given at the end of this examination. The person who claims to have been cured will be invited to meet the medical commission the following year and possibly for many subsequent years.

Finally, after many successful examinations, the file of the cure will be sent, if three-quarters of the doctors present so wish, to the Lourdes International Medical Committee.

This second level of enquiry has existed since 1947. At first it was the Lourdes National Medical Committee; in 1954 it took on the "International" name.

The committee comprises 30 specialists, surgeons and professors or heads of department, from various countries, who meet once a year. The current president is professor Jean-Louis Armand-Laroche.

It allows an assessment to continue over several years in order to observe the development of the patient.

If the International Medical Committee gives a favorable opinion, the file is then sent to the competent Church authorities.

When the file is sent to the bishop of the place where the cured person lives, the case is already recognized as extraordinary by science and medically inexplicable.

It remains for the Church, through the intermediary of the bishop, to make an announcement on the miraculous character of the cure.

To do this, the bishop gathers together a diocesan commission made up of priests, canonists and theologians. The rules that guide the procedures of this commission are those defined in 1734 by the future Pope Benedict XIV in his treatise "Concerning the Beatification and Canonization of Servants of God" (Book IV, Part I, Chapter VIII No. 2).

In sum, the rules demand that there must not be found in the cure any valid explanation, medical or scientific, natural or usual. This is the case for the cures that have taken place at Lourdes. Having established this, it remains for the diocesan commission to determine that the cure comes from God.

Furnished with conclusions reached by the commission, it is up to the bishop to make a definitive pronouncement and to suggest to his diocese and to the world that this cure is seen as a "sign from God."

Now, for a little more than we really "know".  Lourdes prophecy...
This prophecy is from a tabloid but there is supposed to be some fairly reliable sources vouching for its authenticity.    Lourdes Prophecy click here

To return to the home page of PDT signs click here